SACS Reaffirmation
| Objective | 1. Assist Leadership Succession | |
| Assist correctional agencies and departments in leadership succession by preparing personnel in supervisory and mid-management positions for greater responsibility through effective training utilizing the Mid Management Leadership Program Associated Goals: 1. Recognized For Excellence, 2. Provide Leadership, 3. Windows Of Opportunity |
| Indicator | 1. Program Evaluations Program evaluation performed a month after program. |
| Criteria | 1. 4.0+ Satisfaction Rating Obtain an average score above 4.0 on a 5.0 scale together written participant comments. |
| Finding | 1. Satisfactory Program Rating The Mid-Management Program successfully received a 4.0+ satisfaction rating. |
| Action | 1. Mid Management will be continued for next year Will be continued for next year |
| Action | 1.a. Mid Management Curriculum Update Curriculum additions/updates: Team Leader Questionnaire, Team Assessment, Communication Styles, Employee Power Profile, Employee Growth and Development |
| Action | 1.b. Mid-Management Panel Reduced panels from three to one and bringing in two speakers to discuss the required panel topics |
| Action | 1.c. Mid Management Program Addition Added one more program per fiscal year, bringing total number to five programs. |
| Action | 1.d. Mid Management Participant Number Increase Increased number of participants from 30 to 32. |
| Objective | 2. Effective Training | |
| Participants will be provided with effective training on topics mandated by the Community Justice Assistance Division (CJAD) to prepare them for the state certification plan utilizing the Community Supervision Officer Certification Training. Associated Goals: 1. Recognized For Excellence |
| Indicator | 2. Program Evaluation Program evaluation conducted at the completion of the training. |
| Criteria | 2. 3.2+ Satisfaction Rating Obtain an average score above 3.2 on a 4.0 scale together written participant comments. |
| Finding | 2. Satisfactory Program Rating The CSO Certification Training successfully achieved a 3.2+ satisfaction rating. |
| Action | 2. CSO Cert. will be continued for next year Will be continued for next year |
| Action | 2.a. CSO PowerPoint Presentation Updated CSO Trainings PowerPoint presentation slides were re-configured to better match the curriculum. |
| Action | 2.b. CSO Training Curriculum Update Curriculum was reviewed and updated to meet current statutes and standards |
| Action | 2.c. CSO Training Feedback Form Update Feedback form was reviewed and updated to provide better trainer feedback |
| Objective | 3. Effective Training | |
| Participants will be provided with effective training on topics mandated by the Texas Juvenile Probation Commission (TJPC) to make them eligible for certification Associated Goals: 1. Recognized For Excellence |
| Indicator | 3. Program Evaluation Program evaluation conducted at the completion of the training. |
| Criteria | 3. 4.0+ Satisfaction Rating Obtain an average score above 4.0 on a 5.0 scale together written participant comments. |
| Finding | 3. Satisfactory Program Rating The JPO Basic Training successfully received a 4.0+ satisfaction rating. |
| Action | 3. JPO Basic will be continued for next year Will be continued for next year |
| Action | 3.a. JPO Basic Juvenile Law Module The JPO Basic Juvenile Law Module will be split into 2 four hour sessions over 2 days instead of the current 1 day eight hour session. |
| Action | 3.b. JPO Basic Law Enforcement Processing Module Reworked JPO Basic Law Enforcement Processing Module to include more applicable information for the field. |
| Action | 3.c. JPO Basic Participant Workbook Reviewed participant workbook material and referenced all extra handouts in lesson plans for instructor reference. Removed all unnecessary handouts. |
| Objective | 1. Assist Leadership Succession | |
| Assist correctional agencies and departments in leadership succession by preparing personnel in supervisory and mid-management positions for greater responsibility through effective training utilizing the Mid Management Leadership Program Associated Goals: 1. Recognized For Excellence, 2. Provide Leadership, 3. Windows Of Opportunity |
| Indicator | 1. Program Evaluations Program evaluation performed a month after program. |
| Criteria | 1. 4.0+ Satisfaction Rating Obtain an average score above 4.0 on a 5.0 scale together written participant comments. |
| Finding | 1. Satisfactory Program Rating The Mid-Management Program successfully received a 4.0+ satisfaction rating. |
| Action | 1. Mid Management will be continued for next year Will be continued for next year |
| Action | 1.a. Mid Management Curriculum Update Curriculum additions/updates: Team Leader Questionnaire, Team Assessment, Communication Styles, Employee Power Profile, Employee Growth and Development |
| Action | 1.b. Mid-Management Panel Reduced panels from three to one and bringing in two speakers to discuss the required panel topics |
| Action | 1.c. Mid Management Program Addition Added one more program per fiscal year, bringing total number to five programs. |
| Action | 1.d. Mid Management Participant Number Increase Increased number of participants from 30 to 32. |
| Objective | 1. Assist Leadership Succession | |
| Assist correctional agencies and departments in leadership succession by preparing personnel in supervisory and mid-management positions for greater responsibility through effective training utilizing the Mid Management Leadership Program Associated Goals: 1. Recognized For Excellence, 2. Provide Leadership, 3. Windows Of Opportunity |
| Indicator | 1. Program Evaluations Program evaluation performed a month after program. |
| Criteria | 1. 4.0+ Satisfaction Rating Obtain an average score above 4.0 on a 5.0 scale together written participant comments. |
| Finding | 1. Satisfactory Program Rating The Mid-Management Program successfully received a 4.0+ satisfaction rating. |
| Action | 1. Mid Management will be continued for next year Will be continued for next year |
| Action | 1.a. Mid Management Curriculum Update Curriculum additions/updates: Team Leader Questionnaire, Team Assessment, Communication Styles, Employee Power Profile, Employee Growth and Development |
| Action | 1.b. Mid-Management Panel Reduced panels from three to one and bringing in two speakers to discuss the required panel topics |
| Action | 1.c. Mid Management Program Addition Added one more program per fiscal year, bringing total number to five programs. |
| Action | 1.d. Mid Management Participant Number Increase Increased number of participants from 30 to 32. |