Spacer
Assessment : 2012 - 2013 : Educational Programs :
Geography BA

2 Goals    3 Objectives    4 Indicators    4 Criteria    4 Findings    3 Actions


GOAL: Training Geographically Informed Students

Objective  
First-Year Foundational Geographical Principles And Concepts
Students completing core curriculum education in geography will be able to demonstrate foundational knowledge of geographic concepts and principles, including critical thinking.


Indicator  
Comprehensive Final Exam  
Common embedded questions on the comprehensive final exam will determine student knowledge regarding general geographic concepts.
Criterion  
70% Accuracy  
The average scores will be 70% correct on the general geographic concept questions embedded in the comprehensive exam.
Finding  
Performance On General Geographic Concept Questions  
Students enrolled in GEOG 1301 averaged 62% on a series of specific concept questions embedded in a comprehensive final exam. Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 averaged 71% on a separate, yet similar, series of concept questions.  These scores were generally consistent with overall averages on the final exams as a whole, but did decline slightly from the previous year.   
Indicator  
Comprehensive Final Exam - Geographic Principles Portion  
The final faculty-developed comprehensive exam will indicate students' grasp of major geographic principles, including critical thinking.

Criterion  
70% Principle Accuracy  
The average score will be 70% correct of the major geographic principles and critical thinking items embedded on the comprehensive exam.
Finding  
Performance On Questions Pertaining To Major Geographic Concepts And Critical Thinking  
Students enrolled in GEOG 1301 averaged 66% on a series of questions focused on competency with major principles and critical thinking skills that were embedded in a comprehensive exam. Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 averaged 67% on similar series of questions.  Students enrolled in both courses scored lower than expected on questions requiring the interpretation of graphs, but scores for GEOG 1321 represent a noticeable improvement from the previous year. Students enrolled GEOG 1301 averaged 53% on such questions, while students enrolled in GEOG 1321 averaged 62%.   
Actions for Objective:

Action  
Improving Geographical Understanding Of Concepts And Principles  
Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 exhibited a satisfactory level of competency in regards to basic geographical concepts, while students enrolled in GEOG 1301 continue to exhibit a degree of competency slightly below that level.  In both cases, students generally scored as high on questions pertaining to these concepts as they did on the exams as a whole. Students enrolled in those two courses scored below a satisfactory level on questions focused upon major geographical concepts and critical thinking.  However, average scores for students enrolled in GEOG 1321 suggest that this year’s students were more competent with these major concepts than were students from the previous academic year.  Despite modest improvement, there remains a need to significantly enhance student knowledge of such concepts.  This is especially true in regards to critical thinking, particularly for those students enrolled in GEOG 1301.  The higher scores exhibited in this area (major geographic concepts and critical thinking) among students enrolled in GEOG 1321 probably represent the smaller class sizes associated with this particular class.  The higher scores for this class probably also reflect a more focused attempt to emphasize these concept. In comparison to GEOG 1321, there are multiple sections of GEOG 1301 (Weather & Climate) enroll larger numbers of students and are offered in large lecture halls.  These sections are also taught by a variety of faculty members. With this in mind, we plan to continue more strongly incorporating the demonstration of major concepts and critical thinking skills in smaller laboratory sections (GEOG 1101; Weather & Climate Lab). We will also attempt to identify methodologies found to be effective in GEOG 1321 and consider replicating them in other geography courses.


GOAL: Training Geographically Informed Students

Objective  
Demonstrate Knowledge Of Foundational Concepts Of Physical Geography
Students completing the core  education in  geography will demonstrate knowledge of physical geography including the world in spatial terms, places and regions, and physical systems.


Indicator  
Physical Geography Concepts  
Students will correctly answer the embedded questions on exams throughout the semester that address physical geography.  The areas of emphasis include the world in spatial terms, places and regions, and physical systems.
Criterion  
70% Accuracy On Physical Concepts  
Students will score 70% correct on those questions pertaining to each of the three areas of emphasis concerning physical geographical concepts.
Finding  
Student Results Concerning Physical Geography Concepts  
Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 scored an average of 72% on those questions pertaining to the world in spatial terms.   Students enrolled in GEOG 1301 scored an average of 66% on questions assessing this concept.  Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 scored an average of 66 % on those questions pertaining to the concepts of places and regions, while students enrolled in GEOG 1301 scored an average of 63% on questions pertaining to these two concepts. In these two areas (world in spatial terms; places and regions), students generally performed as well as they did on the overall exams as a whole. However, the scores for students in both classes declined somewhat from the previous year. Students enrolled in both courses scored an average of 63% on questions pertaining to physical systems, which is below the average scores on exams as a whole.  
Actions for Objective:

Action  
Improving Understanding Of Physical Concepts In Geography  
There remains considerable room for improvement in the delivery of basic concepts of physical geography. On a positive note, results of this assessment suggest that students completing geography courses generally possess an adequate ability to utilize maps and other graphical tools. They also slightly increased their ability to demonstrate knowledge specific to physical systems.  Students performed slightly below a satisfactory level on questions focused on “places and regions.” Scores from this year’s assessment suggest that students performed less well in this area than was the case in previous years. This very well could reflect the fact that such questions were posed to students enrolled in different classes with varied foci than in earlier years. Perhaps more directly, the courses that were assessed are not directly focused on that dimension of geography. We fully expect to enhance student knowledge in this area by offering a new course on Environmental Geography, a course that will be offered for the first time in Spring 2014. We also plan to expand our assessment approach to include additional courses that more directly focus on “places and regions” (GEOG 2355 and 2356).


GOAL: Demonstrate Knowledge Of Cultural Concepts In Geography

Objective  
Demonstrate Knowledge Of Cultural Concepts In Geography
Students completing the core courses required for a Geography degree will demonstrate knowledge of cultural geography including both human systems and the interaction between the environment and society.

Indicator  
Cultural Geography Concepts  
Students will correctly answer the embedded questions on exams during the semester that address cultural geography.  The areas of emphasis include human systems and the environment and society.
Criterion  
70% Accuracy On Cultural Concepts  
Students will score 70% correct on those questions pertaining to each of the two areas of emphasis associated with cultural geography concepts.
Finding  
Student Learning Outcomes Concerning Cultural Concepts  
Students enrolled in GEOG 3350 and GEOG 1321 scored an average of 73% on a set of questions focused upon human systems.  Those same students scored an average of 62% on questions concerning the interaction of the environment and society.
Actions for Objective:

Action  
Improving Knowledge Of Cultural Aspects Of Geography  
Results of this assessment suggest that geography students continue to possess adequate knowledge of various aspects of cultural geography, including the knowledge of characteristics, distributions, organizations and movement of human, economic and cultural related phenomena.   Student scores on relevant questions assessing these concepts were slightly lower than was the case in the previous academic year, but continue to suggest that the delivery of cultural geography remains a strength of our program.  However, students do continue to exhibit less than satisfactory knowledge of interactions between the environment and society.  Student learning in this area of cultural geography will be significantly enhanced once the new Environmental Geography is offered. The future addition of other courses that focus on physical and environmental geography should also enhance the delivery of this subject matter.  



Previous Cycle's "Plan for Continuous Improvement"

Some of the program weaknesses identified by this assessment will be mitigated by the offering of a new course; Environmental Geography. This new course will directly focus upon material pertaining to the awareness of physical systems and the relationships between the environment and human society.  Certain other learning gaps identified by the assessment may simply reflect weaknesses with the assessment itself.  For example, we offer a few courses that focus on regional geography (World Regional Geography, Regional Geography of U.S. and Canada), that would naturally focus more directly on “places and regions” than would the courses incorporated in this assessment. In the future we will embed assessment questions within the comprehensive finals associated with these regional courses.  The most critical weaknesses identified from this assessment remain in the areas of learning major geographic principles and critical thinking, although student performance in these areas improved considerably from the previous year.  We plan to continue to experiment with ways to enhance critical thinking in both lab and lecture formats, and will make concerted efforts to incorporate assignments and methods found to be successful in GEOG 1321 at generating positive learning outcomes.    
Update on Previous Cycle's "Plan for Continuous Improvement"

As we endeavored to address the weaknesses identified by the previous year’s assessment we implemented the following changes.  First, GEOG 1321 was redeveloped as part of the effort to propose the course for inclusion into the new Core Curriculum scheduled for implementation in 2014. Considerable effort was made to ensure that the course addresses critical thinking and that it focuses on basic geographic principles. At the same, assignments and methods found to be successful at generating positive learning outcomes in the past were given even more attention. Second, a new faculty member was hired whose responsibilities will include offering new courses that will directly strengthen the Environmental Geography concentration.  These new courses will offer considerable potential to increase student knowledge of physical geography and other concepts related to physical systems.  Finally, both World Regional Geography courses (GEOG 2355 and 2356) were also redeveloped for inclusion into the new Core Curriculum. The redevelopment of these courses made it difficult to generate consistent assessment measures during the course of the academic year.  Now that the courses are fully developed, both of them will be incorporated in future assessments.  

Plan for Continuous Improvement

Some of the program weaknesses identified by this assessment will be mitigated by the offering of a new course; Environmental Geography. This new course will directly focus upon material pertaining to the awareness of physical systems and the relationships between the environment and human society.  The addition of new faculty member will also enable us to strengthen our concentration in Environmental Geography via the offering of new courses focused on this subject matter. Certain other learning gaps identified by the assessment may simply reflect weaknesses with the assessment itself.  For example, we offer a few courses that focus on regional geography (World Regional Geography, Regional Geography of U.S. and Canada), that would naturally focus more directly on “places and regions” than would the courses incorporated in this assessment. In the future we will embed assessment questions within the comprehensive finals associated with these regional courses.  The most critical weaknesses identified from this assessment remain in the areas of learning major geographic principles and critical thinking.  The scores from students enrolled in one course (GEOG 1321) did improve for these areas, We plan to continue to experiment with ways to enhance critical thinking in both lab and lecture formats, and will make concerted efforts to incorporate assignments and methods found to be successful in GEOG 1321 at generating positive learning outcomes.


Sub Content Box

Sam Houston State University
Huntsville, TX 77341
(936) 294-1111
1-866-BEARKAT