Spacer
Assessment : 2013 - 2014 : Educational Programs :
Geography BS

2 Goals    3 Objectives    4 Indicators    4 Criteria    4 Findings    3 Actions


GOAL: Training Geographically Informed Students

Objective  
First-Year Foundational Geographical Principles And Concepts
Students completing core curriculum education in geography will be able to demonstrate foundational knowledge of geographic concepts and principles, including critical thinking.


Indicator  
Comprehensive Final Exam  
Common embedded questions on the comprehensive final exam will determine student knowledge regarding general geographic concepts.
Criterion  
70% Accuracy  
The average scores will be 70% correct on the general geographic concept questions embedded in the comprehensive exam.
Finding  
Performance On General Geographic Concept Questions  
Students enrolled in GEOG 1301 averaged 61% on a series of specific concept questions embedded in a comprehensive final exam. Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 averaged 74% on a separate, yet very similar, series of concept questions. Both scores were generally consistent with overall overages on the respective final exams. The scores among students enrolled in GEOG 1301 were slightly lower than those from the previous year, although the scores among those enrolled in GEOG 1321 definitely did improve.
Indicator  
Comprehensive Final Exam - Geographic Principles Portion  
The final faculty-developed comprehensive exam will indicate students' grasp of major geographic principles, including critical thinking.
Criterion  
70% Principle Accuracy  
The average score will be 70% correct of the major geographic principles and critical thinking items embedded on the comprehensive exam.
Finding  
Performance On Questions Pertaining To Major Geographic Concepts And Critical Thinking  
Students enrolled in GEOG 1301 averaged 64% on a series of questions focused on competency with major principles and critical thinking skills that were embedded in a comprehensive exam.  Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 averaged 69% on a similar series of questions. Students enrolled in both courses consistently scored lower than expected on questions requiring the interpretation of graphs and charts, but scores for both courses did improve, particularly in the case of GEOG 1301.  Students enrolled in GEOG 1301 averaged 59% on such questions, while students enrolled in GEOG 1321 averaged 63%.  Students enrolled in both courses scored signficantly lower than expected on questions requiring the interpretation of basic statistics. Students enrolled in GEOG 1301 averaged 54% on such questions, while those enrolled in GEOG 1321 averaged 55% on them.
Actions for Objective:

Action  
Improving Geographical Understanding Of Concepts And Principles  
Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 continue to exhibit a satisfactory level of competency in regards to basic geographic concepts, while students enrolled in GEOG 1301 continue to exhibit degrees of competency slightly below that level.  In both cases, students generally scored as high on questions pertaining to these concepts as they did on exams as a whole. Students also continue to score below satisfactory levels on questions focused upon major geographical concepts and critical thinking. However, such scores did increase for both sets of students, particularly for those students enrolled in GEOG 1301. Regardless of such improvement, there remains a continued need to enhance student knowledege of such concepts. As has been identified in the past, it remains vividly evident that the effectiveness of GEOG 1321, relative to GEOG 1301, in terms of fostering such knowledge is directly due to the smaller class sizes associated with this course. Moreover, students enrolled in GEOG 1301 (Weather & Climate) represent a cross-section of the universtiy who are typiically attempting to fulfill a science requirement.  By comparison, at least some students enrolled in GEOG 1321 (People, Place & the Environment) probably due so because they possess some pre-exisiting interest in the course beforehand.  With this in mind, we plan to continue to more strongly incorporate the teaching of major concepts and critical thinking skills in smaller lab sections of Weather & Climate.  We will also continue to replicate methodologies found to be successful in GEOG 1321 in other geography courses, including Weather & Climate. It should be noted that considerable efforts to address major geographic concepts and critical thinking skills were implemented within these two courses while they were being redeveloped to comply with the new Core Curriculum, which will go into effect in Fall 2014.


GOAL: Training Geographically Informed Students

Objective  
Demonstrate Knowledge Of Foundational Concepts Of Physical Geography
Students completing the core education in geography will demonstrate knowledge of physical geography including the world in spatial terms, places and regions, and physical systems.


Indicator  
Physical Geography Concepts  
Students will correctly answer the embedded questions on exams throughout the semester that address physical geography.  The areas of emphasis include the world in spatial terms, places and regions, and physical systems.
Criterion  
70% Accuracy On Physical Concepts  
Students will score 70% correct on those questions pertaining to each of the three areas of emphasis concerning physical geographical concepts.
Finding  
Student Results Concerning Physical Geography Concepts  
Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 scored on average 70% on those questions pertaining to the world in spatial terms. This score is slightly lower than the score found the previous year, but still meets expectations. Students enrolled in GEOG 1301 scored on average 63% on questions assessing this concept. Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 scored on average 69% on questions pertaining to concepts of places and regions, a higher score than was found the previous year. Students enrolled in GEOG 1301 scored on average 60% on such questions, a lower score than was realized previously.  In those two assessment areas, students generally performed as well as they did on exams as a whole. Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 scored 65% on questions pertaining to physical systems, while students enrolled in GEOG 1301 scored 64% on such questions.  Both scores were slightly increased from that of the previoius year.
Actions for Objective:

Action  
Improving Understanding Of Physical Concepts In Geography  
While there remains considerable room for improvement in the delivery of basic concepts of physical geography, scores for students enrolled in GEOG 1321 suggest that we are indeed improving in the teaching of this subject area - at least within this particular course.  Scores for GEOG 1301, however, did decrease slightly.  The lack of improvment within this course partially stems from the larger class sizes, but is almost certainly also due to the fact that this particular course has been designed to place direct attention on a narrow dimension of this broad subject area.  The scores for questions assessing knowledge of "places and regions," while improving among students enrolled in GEOG 1321, still remain below the expected level.  We have already began assessing student outcomes in this subject area in two separate courses (GEOG 2355 & GEOG 2356) that focus directly on this topic, but results are not yet in a format that could be reported within this assessment cycle. Both of these courses were recently redesigned in order to comply with the new Core Curriculum and this process was done with the need to meet this goal in mind. In Sping 2014 a new Environmental Geography course was offered for the first time, a course that directly focuses on concepts of physical systems.  Accordingly, we fully expect to offer a more thorough assessment of the progams success in meeting this goal by next year.


GOAL: Training Geographically Informed Students - Cultural Aspects

Objective  
Demonstrate Knowledge Of Cultural Concepts In Geography
Students completing the core courses required for a Geography degree will demonstrate knowledge of cultural geography including both human systems and the interaction between the environment and society.

Indicator  
Cultural Geography Concepts  
Students will correctly answer the embedded questions on exams during the semester that address cultural geography.  The areas of emphasis include human systems and the environment and society.
Criterion  
70% Accuracy On Cultural Concepts  
Students will score 70% correct on those questions pertaining to each of the two areas of emphasis associated with cultural geography concepts.
Finding  
Student Learning Outcomes Concerning Cultural Concepts  
Students enrolled in GEOG 3350 scored an averagoe of 74% on a set of questions focused upon human systems.  Students enrolled in GEOG 1321 scored an average of 67% on those same questions. Students enrolled in GEOG 3350 scored 65% on questions concerning the interaction of the environment and society, while students enrolled in GEOG 1321 scored an average of 62% on these questions.
Actions for Objective:

Action  
Improving Knowledge Of Cultural Aspects Of Geography  
Results of this assessment suggest that geography students continue to possess adequate knowledge of various aspects of cultural geography, particularly those enrolled in GEOG 3350.  In previous assessments student scores for both relevant courses, GEOG 1321 & GEOG 3350, were aggregated.  Upon recording and reporting the results from the two courses separately, it becomes apparent that students enrolled in GEOG 3350 do signficantly better than students enrolled in GEOG 1321.  This is largely the function of the fact that students enrolled in GEOG 3350 tend to be juniors and seniors, while GEOG 1321 generally enrolls far more newly incoming students, particularly freshmen.  Moreover, GEOG 3350 (Cultural Geography) directly focuses on the relevant subject matter.  Students enrolled in these courses do less of a better job in demonstrating satisfactory knowledge of interactions between the environment and society.  Future assessments will present the results for students enrolled in a new course (GEOG 2301; Environmental Geography) offerred for the first time in Spring 2014.  Thus, we are confident that we can convey a better idea of how well geography students are doing in this subject area during the next assessment cycle.



Previous Cycle's "Plan for Continuous Improvement"

Some of the program weaknesses identified by this assessment will be mitigated by the offering of a new course; Environmental Geography. This new course will directly focus upon material pertaining to the awareness of physical systems and the relationships between the environment and human society.  The addition of new faculty member will also enable us to strengthen our concentration in Environmental Geography via the offering of new courses focused on this subject matter. Certain other learning gaps identified by the assessment may simply reflect weaknesses with the assessment itself.  For example, we offer a few courses that focus on regional geography (World Regional Geography, Regional Geography of U.S. and Canada), that would naturally focus more directly on “places and regions” than would the courses incorporated in this assessment. In the future we will embed assessment questions within the comprehensive finals associated with these regional courses.  The most critical weaknesses identified from this assessment remain in the areas of learning major geographic principles and critical thinking.  The scores from students enrolled in one course (GEOG 1321) did improve for these areas, We plan to continue to experiment with ways to enhance critical thinking in both lab and lecture formats, and will make concerted efforts to incorporate assignments and methods found to be successful in GEOG 1321 at generating positive learning outcomes.    
Update on Previous Cycle's "Plan for Continuous Improvement"

Two of the courses - GEOG 1401 (formerly 1301) and GEOG 1321 - utilized for this assessment have been fully redevolped so that they comply with the new core curriculum, which goes into effect in Fall 2014.  During this process these courses were specifically restructured so that they would facilate the exact learning outcomes reflected in the goals of this assessment, such as critical learning and awareness of major geographic principles.  Two other courses (GEOG 2355 & 2356) were also redeveloped for the new core, both emphasizing the teaching of other recognized goals (ex. "places and regions").  These two courses were utilized for assessment for the first time this past spring, but results are not yet in a format that could be presented here.  Given the restructuring of these courses to more directly serve the goals outlined on this assessment, analysis of student outcomes associated with future sections of these courses will be informative.  A new Environmental Geography course was taught for the first time in Spring 2014, a course which focuses more directly on physical systems and human-environment interaction than any other course in our curriculum.  These same two subject areas represent two identifable weaknesses within our program. Given that this brand new course was offered by a new faculty member, it was not possible to generate results as of yet.  We fully expect to have a better picture during the next assessment cycle of how well our program is doing at enhancing this particular need.
Plan for Continuous Improvement

Many of the weakenesses identified by student outcomes from this assessment represent weaknesses that have also been recognized on previous assessments.  To that effect, we have proactively redesigned some of our courses to better serve the needs for enhanced critical critical thinking and to faciliate the learning of both basic and major geographical concepts.  We have also attempted to replicate methodologies proven to be efffective in some courses (GEOG 1321) so that they could be implemented in other courses.  Some of these methodologies, when applicable, will be implemented in lab sections so that we can take advantage of the intimacy of smaller class sizes.  We plan to further improve upon this overall endeavor by incorporating the assessment of additional courses that better serve certain specifc goals, such as World Regional Geography and Environmental Geography.  These courses should offer a better test of how well we our program is doing at teaching "regions and places" and "physical systems," respectively.  Perhaps the biggest change we have made involves our efforts to fix the identifiable need to enhance student understanding of basic statistical measures, a weakness reflected within this assessment.  Based on these results, we have restructured our degree requirements so that all geography majors will be required to successfully complete a basic statistics course.  In addition, we have also incorporated some elementary statistical procedures within one of our introductory geography courses (GEOG 1321).  Finally, we plan to continue our efforts to experiement with different ways to enhance learning across our curriculum in order to generate positive learning outcomes.


Sub Content Box

Sam Houston State University
Huntsville, TX 77341
(936) 294-1111
1-866-BEARKAT