Assessment : 2012 - 2013 : Educational Programs :
Criminal Justice, Security Studies MS
2 Goals 2 Objectives 2 Indicators 2 Criteria 3 Findings 2 Actions
GOAL: Application Of Security Content / Principles In Real World Settings
|
|
|
Objective
|
|
Students Will Demonstrate The Ability To Security Principles In Vivo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Students preparing to graduate with a Master of Science will demonstrate the ability to apply security principles in the real world.
|
Indicator
|
|
Written Demonstration Of Application Of Principles
|
|
|
|
|
As a part of their assessed work, students will be required to apply the leadership and management principles presented in their courses to real world environments. This will take the form of essay exam questions or learning journal entries. This indicator will not be based on the examination or journal entries as a whole, but rather, on those aspects of the assignment that focus directly on the application of principles.
|
Criterion |
|
At Least 85% Of Students Will Obtain A Rating Of Satisfactory Or Better
|
|
|
|
|
At least 85% of the students will demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge to their own working environments to sufficient depth as to receive a designation of “satisfactory” or better from the instructor.
|
Finding |
|
Application Of Security Principles In Vivo.
|
|
|
|
|
This criterion was met as evidenced by student performance in the capstone course which requires application of theory to practice and integration of theory and practice; as well as by students' written work at their internship sites where students directly apply theory to practice and integrate the two. These were based on subjective ratings by the relevant instructors. For the 2013-2014 academic year, instructors will be asked to develop a rubric to assess these domains specifically. Rubrics developed for the M.S. program in Leadership and Management will be offered to the instructors as samples.
|
Finding |
|
|
|
|
More than 85% of the students evaluated received a rating of "satisfactory" or better.
|
Actions for Objective:
Action |
|
Develop Of Rubric To Assess Application Of Leadership & Mgmt. To Practice.
|
|
|
|
|
We will develop and implement a rubric assessing the application of leadership and management to practice and will employ that rubric instead of the 85% criterion.
|
GOAL: Integration Of Theory And Practice
|
|
|
Objective
|
|
Students Will Demonstrate The Ability To Integrate Theory And Practice
|
|
|
|
|
|
Students preparing to graduate with a Master of Science will demonstrate the ability to integrate theory and practice.
|
Indicator
|
|
Written Demonstration Of Integration Of Theory And Practice
|
|
|
|
|
As a part of their assessed work, students will be required to integrate theory and practice. This will be in the form of essay exam questions or learning journal entries. This indicator will not be based on the examination or journal entries as a whole, but rather, on those aspects of the assignment that focus directly on the application of principles.
|
Criterion |
|
At Least 85% Of Students Will Obtain A Rating Of Satisfactory Or Better To Apply Knowledege
|
|
|
|
|
At least 85% of the students will demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge to their own working environments to sufficient depth as to receive a designation of “satisfactory” or better from the instructor.
|
Finding |
|
Integration Of Theory And Practice
|
|
|
|
|
This criterion was met as evidenced by student performance in the capstone course which requires application of theory to practice and integration of theory and practice; as well as by students' written work at their internship sites where students directly apply theory to practice and integrate the two. These were based on subjective ratings by the relevant instructors. For the 2013-2014 academic year, instructors will be asked to develop a rubric to assess these domains specifically. Rubrics developed for the M.S. program in Leadership and Management will be offered to the instructors as samples.
|
Actions for Objective:
Action |
|
Develop Rubric Assessing Integration Of Theory With Practice
|
|
|
|
|
We will develop and implement a rubric assessing the integration of theory and practice and will employ that rubric instead of the 85% criterion.
|
Previous Cycle's "Plan for Continuous Improvement"
|
Student goals for the MS in Security Studies were largely met for this reporting period; however, additional work needs to be done in order to assure that each student receives maximum benefit from the program. During the last reporting period, student comments regarding quality of instruction were very favorable; however, students suggested the program could include additional and more focused national security-related content. To this end, in Fall 2011 semester a visiting professor was hired who taught four classes this past academic year covering subjects not normally available to students. We will continue this practice in the coming academic year in order to seek additional quality course content pertinent to the Master of Security Studies program.
Also, greater emphasis needs to be placed on following students' progress as they seek their first jobs. In fields as variable as Homeland Security or Private Security students are often lost when it comes to beginning a job search. A well maintained follow-up database of successful student job searches would be a positive step to creating an in-house capacity for getting current students in touch with former students who are already in the job market.
In summary, while we are generally pleased with our students’ performance in the Security Studies program, we are constantly seeking ways to improve the curriculum’s overall quality, thereby enhancing the overall educational experience for Security Studies students.
|
Update on Previous Cycle's "Plan for Continuous Improvement"
|
We have hired a full-time security studies faculty member, John Payne, who specializes in national security issues. Moreover, we have begun a database of alumni and internship placement sites to facilitate job searches for our graduates.
|
Plan for Continuous Improvement
|
With two new full-time faculty members and a revamped program we are in the process of developing assessment tools for student outcomes and faculty outcomes. We hope to implement those so they are in place by Fall, 2014. The aforementioned rubrics will be part of that process.
|