Assessment : 2011 - 2012 : Educational Programs :
Instructional Technology MED
2 Goals 2 Objectives 2 Indicators 2 Criteria 2 Findings 2 Actions
GOAL: Program Visibility And Impact
|
|
|
Objective
|
|
Graduate Candidate Professional Presentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology facilitator candidates in the Masters of Education in Instructional Technology program will design presentations that address the needs of all learners.
|
Indicator
|
|
Graduate Candidate Professional Presentation
|
|
|
|
|
A common embedded portion of each presentation assignment developed by program faculty will require proper use of presentation software, including text elements, layout, graphics, and internal/external navigation.
|
Criterion |
|
CI 5365 - Technology And Cognition PowerPoint For Chunking Indicators Scores
|
|
|
|
|
Technology facilitator candidates must score at least 80% correct on the Presentation for Chunking indicators embedded in the CI 5365 - Technology and Cognition Learning Strategies and Technology assignment.
|
Finding |
|
Professional Presentation Development
|
|
|
|
|
During the 2011-2012 academic year, Cohort V Instructional Technology graduate candidates were required to develop a presentation utilizing chunking to present information for a content area where candidate’s students experienced trouble understanding a concept. Candidates were expected to develop a non-linear PowerPoint, allowing the learner to choose the order in which each “chunk” of information is received. Text elements were to be appropriate in length for the target audience, to the point, and easy-to-read. Use of italics, bold, indentations, backgrounds, colors, headings, and font point size should enhance readability. The layout was to be visually pleasing and contribute to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings and white space. Graphics were to assist in presenting an overall theme and enhance understanding of concept, ideas and relationships. Images should employ proper size and resolution, and all images must enhance the content. All links were to be active and functioning properly. Overall, all sixteen Cohort V Instructional Technology graduate candidates (100%) were successful in developing a presentation utilizing chunking to present information for a content area where candidate’s students experienced trouble understanding a concept. Minor errors in linking sub-pages to a main slide and including off topic graphics were present.
|
Actions for Objective:
Action |
|
Remediating Use Of PowerPoint For Professional Presentations
|
|
|
|
|
In an effort to increase the ability of Masters of Education in Instructional Technology candidates to design presentations that address the needs of all learners, PowerPoint presentations being completed throughout the Program will be assessed for effective development, including text elements, layout, graphics, and internal/external navigation. Program faculty will continually remind candidates, through assignment instructions, of the basic rules to effective presentation development and common errors to avoid.
|
GOAL: Program Quality And Effectiveness
|
|
|
Objective
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA) Publication Style
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology facilitator candidates in the Masters of Education in Instructional Technology program will employ American Psychological Association (APA) Style in formal writing, including internal documentation and works cited.
|
Indicator
|
|
Use Of APA Style In Formal Writing
|
|
|
|
|
A common embedded portion of each literature review assignment developed by program faculty will require proper use of APA style, including internal documentation and works cited.
|
Criterion |
|
CI 5365 - Technology And Cognition Literature Review APA Indicator Scores
|
|
|
|
|
Technology facilitator candidates must score at least 80% correct on the APA indicator embedded in the CI 5365 - Technology and Cognition Literature Review assignment.
|
Finding |
|
APA Style In Formal Writing
|
|
|
|
|
Cohort V Instructional Technology graduate candidates were required to synthesize research regarding technology/cognition/brain issues in a cohesive review of literature during the 2011-2012 academic year. Candidates were expected to utilize proper APA style within the literature review, including the citations and bibliography. Eleven of sixteen Cohort V Instructional Technology graduate candidates (69%) successfully scored at least 80% correct on the APA Indicator embedded in the CIED 5365 - Technology and Cognition Literature Review assignment. The majority of candidates (15/16; 94%) correctly employed internal documentation and alphabetized reference list entries by the last name of the first author of each work. Most candidates (10/16; 63%) were not successful in properly using APA 6th edition style to cite resources in the works cited. Specifically, when referring to books, chapters, articles, or Web pages, many candidates failed to capitalize only the first letter of the first word of a title and subtitle, the first word after a colon or a dash in the title, and proper nouns. Instead, candidates tended to capitalize all words in a title. Candidates also had a tendency to overlook the hanging indentation for each entry in the reference list. All lines after the first line of each entry in the reference list should be indented one-half inch from the left margin. Finally, candidates tended to overlook the fact that APA 6th edition style no longer requires that retrieval dates be listed in the works cited for web resources and that doi is preferred when an article is made available electronically.
|
Actions for Objective:
Action |
|
Remediating Application Of APA Style Skills
|
|
|
|
|
In an effort to increase the percentage of Masters of Education in Instructional Technology candidates who correctly practice proper APA 6th edition Style in formal writing, written work being completed throughout the Program will be assessed for proper APA 6th edition style as part of candidates evaluative grades. Program faculty will continually remind candidates, through assignment instructions, of the basic rules to properly using APA 6th edition (as opposed to 5th edition) style to cite resources.
|
As a faculty, we will encourage students to present at professional development conferences and meetings by reviewing with them any documentation feedback from presentation attendees and through mentoring students in presentation effectiveness. Presentations being completed throughout the Program will be assessed for effective development, including text elements, layout, graphics, and internal/external navigation. Also, in an effort to increase the percentage of Masters of Education in Instructional Technology candidates who correctly practice proper APA 6th edition formatting skills in formal writing, APA 6th edition formatting in candidate’s formal written work being completed earlier throughout the Program will be assessed as part of their evaluative grades.
|