SACS Reaffirmation
| Objective | Apply Core Concepts | |
| students who complete the Sociology Program will be able to apply the core concepts of the discipline Associated Goals: Apply Core Concepts |
| Indicator | Two Sociological Papers--Methodology Two sociological papers written by each graduating student during the Spring semester of his/her senior year are selected. They are evaluated by a three Faculty Member committee appointed by the Chair. The papers are assigned a combined score from 1 to 5 where one is inadequate knowledge of sociology and 5 is excellent knowledge of sociology. Employing their professional expertise in sociology, faculty assign a maximum of two points for the theories presented in the papers, a maximum of two points for the methodologies employed in the papers, and a maximim of one point for the articulation of the papers. |
| Criteria | Desired Results--Methodology At least 80% of papers should be rated 3 or better on the 5 point-scale. Two points can be given for methodology. |
| Finding | Methodology Component 90 % of students'''' writing samples earned a 3 rating or better and satisfied the methodology requirement |
| Action | Methodology Component The department will continue using the same strategies to improve the program. In the review of faculty''s performance, the chair will meet with each faculty member to discuss how to improve teaching strategies |
| Objective | Communication Tools | |
| The BS Sociology Program provides studennts with the scientific tools to be able to communicate the results obtained through the application of the core concepts of Sociology Associated Goals: Communicate Results |
| Indicator | Two Sociological Papers--Communication Two sociological papers written by each graduating student during the Spring semester of his/her senior year are selected. They are evaluated by a three Faculty Member committee appointed by the Chair. The papers are assigned a combined score from 1 to 5 where one is inadequate knowledge of sociology and 5 is excellent knowledge of sociology. Employing their professional expertise in sociology, faculty assign a maximum of two points for the theories presented in the papers, a maximum of two points for the methodologies employed in the papers, and a maximim of one point for the articulation of the papers. |
| Criteria | Desired Results--Communication At least 80% of papers should be rated 3 or better on the 5 point scale. One point may be given for the articulation of the ideas. |
| Finding | Communication Component 90% of students'''' writings samples earned a 3 rating or better and satisfied the communication component. |
| Action | Communication Component The department will continue using the same strategies to improve the program. In the review of faculty''s performance, the chair will meet with each faculty member to discuss how to improve teaching strategies |
| Objective | Understand Core Concepts | |
| Student will demonstrate competence using scientific tools applied to the understanding of the core concepts of Sociology Associated Goals: Understand Core Sociology Concepts |
| Indicator | Two Sociological Papers--Theory Two sociological papers written by each graduating student during the Spring semester of his/her senior year are selected. They are evaluated by a three Faculty Member committee appointed by the Chair. The papers are assigned a combined score from 1 to 5 where one is inadequate knowledge of sociology and 5 is excellent knowledge of sociology. Employing their professional expertise in sociology, faculty assign a maximum of two points for the theories presented in the papers, a maximum of two points for the methodologies employed in the papers, and a maximim of one point for the articulation of the papers. |
| Criteria | Desired Results--Theory At least 80% of papers should be rated 3 or better on the 5 point scale. Two points may be given in theory. |
| Finding | Theory Component 90 % of students'''' writing samples earned a 3 rating or better and satisfied the theory requirement |
| Action | Theory Component The department will continue using the same strategies to improve the program. In the review of faculty''s performance, the chair will meet with each faculty member to discuss how to improve teaching strategies |